Mysticism, the Erotic and the
Macabre
Mysticism
is a complex and multifaceted topic, an active topic of investigation in religious
studies in the last decades. With the two main schools of perennialists and
constructivists offering points of study and approach that are still subjects
of debate, it is hard to establish what constitutes mysticism in practice. I
was intrigued by the specific topic that Jeffrey J. Krepal chooses to explore “Exactly as if it were female orgasm: The
Mystical and the Erotic” and I explore the topic in relation to the
philosophical school of Tantra practices. I investigate these ideas in relation
to the erotic and the macabre using Vajrayana and yoga as my canvas. I am
particularly interested in the aspects of magic, pleasure and mystical
transcendence.
Mysticism
is one of these words in religious science that are still attached to working
definitions since it is the subject of intense debate of what would constitute
a mystical experience. The two schools that are prevalent in the study of
mysticism today offer similar yet distinctly separate definitions that aim at
removing the ambiguity around the term. Mysticism, Kripal states is a term that
appeared in the 20th century in the sense that we understand it
today in religious studies. “The
term ‘mysticism,’ comes from the Greek μυω, meaning “to conceal.” In the
Hellenistic world, ‘mystical’ referred to “secret” religious rituals. In early
Christianity the term came to refer to “hidden” allegorical interpretations of
Scriptures and to hidden presences, such as that of Jesus at the Eucharist.” In
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, mysticism is defined as “a constellation of distinctive practices,
discourses, texts, institutions, traditions, and experiences aimed at human
transformation, variously defined in different traditions”. The term
mysticism started appearing in the scholarship of those known as the
perennialists philosophers, such as William James, Evelyn Underhill, Joseph
Marechal, William Johnson, James Pratt, Micrea Eliade, W.T. Stace, Steven Katz,
and Robert Forman amongst others. In that school mystical experiences are
defined as representing ‘an immediate direct contact with a variously defined
absolute principle. After that direct contact the experience is interpreted
according to the tradition’s language and beliefs.”
In the beginning of the last century the
term appeared and evolved in definition. The first notable attempt was
delivered by James in 1902 in lectures 16 and 17 he proposes four marks which,
when an experience has them, may justify us in calling it mystical: 1.
Ineffability 2. Noetic Quality 3. Transiency and 4. Passivity. James
notes that “although the oncoming of mystical states may be facilitated by
preliminary voluntary operations, as by fixing the attention, or going through
certain bodily performances, or in other ways which manuals of mysticism
prescribe; yet when the characteristic sort of consciousness once has set in,
the mystic feels as if his own will were in abeyance, and indeed sometimes as
if he were grasped and held by a superior power.” It is thus noteworthy that
the practice of Tantra that we are exploring, with the choreographed
performance of mudras and recitation
of mantras under the careful guidance
of the guru, is in fact a path to
attaining what James would hope to end up as a passive mystical experience.
The point of the practice of Tantra is
not the attainment of siddhi magical
powers and yet this is part of the promise of the path, involving the
traditions concerning the Tantric Adepts known as the Siddhas (perfected ones).
It is the nature of the practice of Tantra pactice to fix one’s attention to the breath, or to an object of adoration,
like a Bodhisattva or a deity. It is common to perform mudras or other bodily
postures to support the mind’s focus, or the creative visualization of the
deities. The promise is to attain enlightment when one only purifies
themselves. In an example Kapstein imparts regarding the path of enlightment of
a yaksini condemned to be tortured in
a cemetery and then suffering, two dakinis
who took pity on her “encouraged the yaksini to seek the attainments of the
Tantric divinities through five practices which they asked the [84 Mahasiddhas
that were in the astral planes] to impart to her: master Khagardha’s
abbreviated rites of Lord Acala; Kanapira’s rites of the Mother of Wisdom;
Dombipa’s rites which combine the tantric divinities Cakrasamvara and Hevarja;
Caloka’s rites of Amtayus, the Buddha of longevity; and Naropa’s instructions
on the hundred-syllable mantra of purification and repentance.[…] the two
dakinis [promised] that all those who have gone before have realized the
attainments. If you have not is because you failed to purify you own continuum
of being.” (p 64-66) And so the path of the siddhas promises attainment if the adept, even being a yaksini in
this case, follows the guidance of the guru, the two dakinis imparting the
wisdom of the siddhas in this case. It
is also a part of the path to be engulfed in secrets, as the adept must adhere
to the appropriate Tantric vows and enjoy the result through the power of
secrets.
“Mysticism is a modern comparative category
that has been used in a wide variety of ways to locate, describe and evaluate
individuals’ experience of communion, union and identity with the sacred” (p
321) states Kripal, and he clarifies: “in the words of the French philosopher
George Bataille, it is death and sensual rapture that speak most effectively
and accurately of the human experience of becoming one with the greater whole.”
(p 327). And so Krippel proposes that it is to death and eroticism that we must
turn in order to better understand mysticism.
In
exploring death, McDaniel (2000) explored the tantric ritual of feeding skulls
to honor the Goddess Kali, in West Bengal. Skulls are thought to bring
protective energy (sakri) and support the sadhu in his efforts. Often painted
red, they are relics that mediate to the supernatural realm (alaurika) and call
for the Goddess Kali. The sadhu takes his power (sakti) from the skulls to
strengthen him in his quest. Skulls awaken the Goddess and bring her presence
to the ritual practices. The skulls are selected carefully, with preference to
people who died young or with violence. “The dead object becomes the vessel for
a living presence through ritual. The souls from the skulls are like the
Tantric consort or uttara sadhika, in
that they assist in ritual practice” (p 77).
“Right
handed” philosophical views have emerged from the “left handed” preexisting
Tantric practices, some of a sexual nature. At the root of the practice of
Tantra is the Mandala, often centered on a yantra,
as in sri yantra, a way to control
one’s conceptual reality through a “mesocosmic” device. “It is the nature of
this grid or template, together with the chosen medium of this process of
divine embodiment that differentiates one form of Tantra from another. The
template [can be] the body of a naked maiden, and the medium her sexual or
menstruating discharge” (p 11). It is in that sense that Tantra venerates the
female body. In later traditions the maiden was replaced by the deity and the
medium could be the sound or the subtle energetic body of the practitioner. Today
the mandala, containing hidden the sri yantra, is the object of focus often
displayed in erotic tantric art.
In
conclusion, Tantra is a living example of what Kripal suggests we turn to in
order to better understand mysticism: death and eroticism. Tantric philosophy
and practice embody both the macabre and the erotic in a bid to transcend the
limits of this reality and in an accelerated path guide the practitioner to the
subtle realms of the mystical. As Kripal argued that “much like the sexual body in contemporary
gender theory, even the mystical body displays the intricacies of human culture
and the marks of human language” and that “we hear of many essences and many
minds, but seldom do we hear of actual skin, of genitals and sexual fluids, of
fingers and toes, or of faces and smiles and groans” I took the bid to explore
a place where in fact the mandala of the body is used, the medium of the
transient nature of humanity is explored and worshiped and transcendence and
magic meet in the service of the sannyasi. The ultimate goal of both those who
“know” and who “do” will be to enlighten and in the process to liberate all
other creatures from suffering existence. The path is that of the mystical, the
magical Tantra. And so Tantra, in that sense, meets the scholarly definitions
of the vehicle to produce the mystical experience.
References
James, William “The Variety of Religious
Experiences” (1902) Religious Classics.
Kapstein, Matthew I. “King Kunji’s
Banquet” in Tantra in Practice, (2000)
edited by White, David Gordon, Princeton University Press.
Kripal, Jeffrey J. “Mysticism” in The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion (2006) edited by
Robert A. Segal. Blackwell Publishing
McDaniel, June “Interviews with a
Tantric Kali Priest: Feeding Skulls in the Town of Sacrifice” in Tantra in Practice, (2000) edited by
White, David Gordon, Princeton University Press.
Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy, www.plato.stanford.edu
White, David Gordon “Tantra in Practice:
Mapping a Tradition” in Tantra in
Practice, (2000) edited by White, David Gordon, Princeton University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment